I have been…..banned from Christian Forums. I have to admit I hoped that would not happen mainly because I enjoyed the men’s area. On the other hand, it frees up a great deal of time I was wasting reading and posting among the very groups I just wrote about here. Gynocentrism is everywhere. Few places have it in such volume and from so many different voices as CF.
That forum as being representative of the church. Like what would happen in a church, I was banned by a committee of women. The moderators at CF (Christian Forums) are 95% women. Even the male moderators have had problems with the women there. Women moderating men cannot work….period, sorry.
It is representative of the church and what is and isnt tolerated. While one cannot ban people from church per se, they can ban certain beliefs from being represented as institutionalized. These would be the same ones that have been systematically dis-allowed at CF.The posts from the feminists at CF are the letters a traditional pastor would receive. If he persisted, they would drag their families elsewhere until they find an ear friendly church, much the same as many of them have migrated to some equalitcentral website where a man states :
“Complimentarianism is male supremacy, denials are just words”
Talk of submission at CF is forbidden because members who subscribe to the so called traditional view are not welcome. Shux, there is a present thread where the OP asked if those people who DO believe in male led homes would speak to how they think that should look, and members that are rabid egalitarians cannot restrain themselves from venom spewing, to the extent one even insists the poor fellow rewrite his OP so its clearer.
Divorce, we have seen, cannot be discussed as a negative behavior.
Sex cannot be recognized as a need, and celebrated as a coequal part of marriage. If sex isnt kept in a low place, being a sort of bonus for those marriages that do everything else correctly, then its not welcome as a topic.
On and on, examples abound. With each one came new rules that say the topic cannot be discussed there. The end result is a married forum where marriage by biblical standards cannot be discussed unless its the full fledged feminist standards today’s church has adopted.
Now, Ive been banned for taking the topics elsewhere and discussing them where I will not be warned or deleted for stepping out of gynocentric bounds. The moderator banning me plainly stated that while there was no rule about what had been done, my taking topics elsewhere and pasting them “hurt men and women”, hence I’m banned.
CF is a great source for data to highlight the feminized church. like HuffPo is a good secular source for the gender insanity outside the church CF is a large multi-denominational sample of evangelical feminism from which I will draw, topically. I wont use names and I wont call anyone stupid. But the topics and views are fair game.
Some will accuse me of retribution. That’s not the case I assure you, I scan the internet all the time for things to write about. Usually what I find are articles written by journalists or at least amateur writers, blogs, etc. At CF its like a window into a busy church lobby, or the women’s bible study. When they speak topically, I will respond topically. That excludes any personal matters, and always has.
So, banned, permanently. Soft censorship violates no laws, of course. Its silly to make things like that a free speech topic.
Funny, during the outcry about the terrible pasting of CF topics to other forums, someone (rightly) said ”
I don’t disagree with that. But since the topic is what is posted at another website, I have a hard time understanding what anyone expects CF to do about it. They can only enforce what is posted here, and that’s not the topic at hand.
Really? They must want to control the whole dang internet, maybe Al Gore is a member at CF.